Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation about the usefulness and potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the field of artificial intelligence. It constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the societal implications of technology and its development. The tone is critical, the intent is to express skepticism about the current hype and utility of LLMs, and the content addresses concerns about misinformation, security, and technical debt.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to intend harm but is critical of LLMs.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, and compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to caution against potential overestimation of LLMs, which could be seen as contributing to societal betterment. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly, despite a critical viewpoint. [+1]