The statement is a critique of the House's decision to reauthorize FISA 702 and an expression of concern over the expansion of surveillance powers. It is part of a larger conversation about the implications of this legislation on privacy and the role of businesses in government surveillance. The tone is critical and urgent, with the intent to raise awareness and mobilize action against the bill.
- The statement aims to do no harm but expresses strong disapproval of the legislation, which could be seen as harmful to those who support it. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by advocating against increased surveillance. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the legislation's implications but may lack empathy for those with opposing views. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the bill without personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage civic action for what the speaker believes is the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a matter of public concern. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.