Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is analytical and speculative, considering the potential consequences of scaling up a technology with known issues. It is a critical examination of the reliability of self-driving technology and its readiness for widespread adoption without human intervention.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is cautionary and aims to prevent harm by highlighting the risks of scaling up self-driving technology without addressing its flaws. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by drawing attention to the potential problems that could arise from a large-scale deployment of self-driving cars. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of self-driving technology and invites dialogue about its safety. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is based on a user's reported experience and contributes to correcting misconceptions about the technology's current state. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to caution against premature adoption of self-driving technology without sufficient safety measures. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly sharing concerns about a public issue. [+1]