Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
4/17/2024, 4:02:42 AM
X
In reply to:
Xkaly
@Xkaly0
·
634d
@GaryMarcus A new gold rush? I don´t think that's a positive analogy.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
634d
That’s actually the problem here: faith.

We don’t need faith.

We need a form of AI that can sanity check its own answers.

LLMs have shown time and again that they aren’t it.
Bot man
@botyetnotbot
·
634d
@GaryMarcus LLMs are start of new gold rush. It's just a glimpse of what's possible. We will definitely see some new way to train models that will reduce hallucinations and make them more situationally aware. A lot needs to be done and it will be done by someone. I have full faith.

The statement is a critical response to the analogy of AI development being likened to a gold rush, highlighting the potential disregard for negative consequences similar to those seen during the historical gold rush. It engages in a discussion about the ethical considerations of AI development and its societal impact.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on raising awareness about potential negative impacts of AI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but rather discusses the broader implications of technology. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The tone is critical but not disrespectful or aggressive, promoting understanding of the historical context and its relevance to current technological developments. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites constructive criticism and dialogue about the ethical development of AI, without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    While there is no explicit acknowledgment of mistakes, the statement's critical nature implies a willingness to correct course if necessary.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to raise important questions about the development of AI, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, contributing to the dialogue on AI ethics with integrity. [+1]