Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement by @GaryMarcus, shared in a @techreview interview, constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with the issue of AI policy and its urgency. The statement addresses a significant public concern about the need for timely action in the realm of artificial intelligence, which is a topic of broad societal interest and impact.
- The statement aims to raise awareness without causing harm, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By advocating for urgent policy action, the statement promotes understanding and potentially fosters empathy towards the implications of AI on society. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue on AI policy without engaging in personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The call for action in AI policy uses influence to potentially better society by addressing critical issues in technology governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss a significant issue, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.