Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
4/18/2024, 9:21:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
621d
@GaryMarcus @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis "some kind of combination of AlphaGo capabilities built on top of these large models. Introspection and planning capabilities will help with things like hallucination, I think." This sounds a bit like the Q* stuff - it's possible OpenAI already has something like this.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
621d
@gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis i think he did at one point. This recent interview seems more cautious, without any specific date: https://www.wired.com/story/deep…
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
621d
@GaryMarcus @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis Didn't Hassabis say "this decade"?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
621d
Ray Kurzweil claimed today @TEDTalks “Two years.. three years .. four years. .. five years … everybody agrees now AGI is
very soon.”

I don’t agree. @ylecun doesn’t agree. I doubt @demishassabis agrees.

Here are seven reasons to doubt Kurzweil’s projection:
• Current systems…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the development and implications of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically discussing the capabilities and limitations of introspection in AI systems. The conversation involves multiple public figures and experts in the field, addressing significant issues related to AI technology and its future.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it constructively contributes to the discussion on AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing solely on the topic without personal attacks or inappropriate content. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning the feasibility of introspection in AI, thus contributing to a deeper analysis of AI systems. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by expressing skepticism about the capability of AI systems for introspection, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to contribute to a critical discussion on AI, aiming for a better understanding of its capabilities and limitations. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion about AI, adhering to the principles of free speech. [+1]