Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 94
4/19/2024, 6:55:07 AM
X
In reply to:
Ori Nagel ⏸️
@ygrowthco
·
586d
@GaryMarcus @MelMitchell1 @gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis Hasabis’ 2030 prediction is only 1 year out of Kurzweil’s window. Some may disagree, sure, but Demis Hasabis is weak supporting evidence for that angle.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
586d
@ygrowthco @MelMitchell1 @gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis I hedged if you say OP. But Here (2022) he said a few years or a decade: https://www.reddit.com/r/singula…

Here 2023 saying same: https://thenextweb.com/news/when…
Ori Nagel ⏸️
@ygrowthco
·
586d
@GaryMarcus @MelMitchell1 @gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis Yeah. In the meantime though a bunch of people have seen your post claiming it's a mutual agreed upon position between you and him.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
586d
@ygrowthco @MelMitchell1 @gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis thanks. maybe i shouldn’t count him on my side then… I am pretty sure I heard him say a decade somewhere recently?
Ori Nagel ⏸️
@ygrowthco
·
586d
@GaryMarcus @MelMitchell1 @gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis That was his Hard Fork interview just a little over month ago https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
586d
@ygrowthco @MelMitchell1 @gcolbourn @TEDTalks @ylecun @demishassabis when was that/link?

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter involving multiple users discussing the predictions and statements made by tech figures regarding the arrival of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The discourse involves analysis and critique of public figures' predictions, which are relevant to societal understanding of technological advancements and their implications. This qualifies as public discourse as it substantively addresses public issues related to technology and its future impact on society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but lacks clarity, which could potentially lead to misunderstandings.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, avoiding any personal attacks or sensitive personal information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to clarify previous discussions, which could promote better understanding among participants, though it could be more empathetic or compassionate in tone.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by referencing previous statements and predictions, aiming to correct or challenge them without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss important technological predictions, potentially influencing public opinion or understanding, thus contributing to societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds principles of free speech by engaging in a public, multi-participant dialogue on a significant issue without misusing the platform. [+1]