Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a significant legal event involving a former president, which is a matter of public interest and concern. It provides factual information about the jury selection and the charges against Donald Trump, contributing to public understanding of ongoing judicial proceedings.
- The statement adheres to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions by sticking to factual reporting without sensationalism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not delving into unnecessary personal details beyond what is relevant for the public's understanding of the trial. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses words to promote understanding of a legal process, thereby fostering informed civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by providing a clear, factual update on a legal matter, which can encourage informed discussion among the public. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about a significant legal event, contributing positively to society by enhancing transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by reporting on a matter of public concern without bias or defamation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.