Ilhan Omar

The statement is a critique of the current U.S. Supreme Court's decisions and actions, perceived as being heavily influenced by special interests. It expresses concern over the impact of these decisions on reproductive rights, environmental protection, and more. The statement also mentions the introduction of the Judicial Ethics Enforcement Act as a response to demand accountability and ethical standards within the judiciary.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to do no harm but rather seeks to address perceived injustices and promote judicial accountability. [+2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects the dignity of others by advocating for rights and protections without attacking individuals personally. [+2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The call for judicial accountability and the introduction of legislation promote understanding and compassion for those affected by the court's decisions. [+2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Supreme Court's decisions and promotes dialogue about judicial ethics. [+2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The speaker acknowledges the need for legislative action, suggesting a willingness to correct what they see as systemic issues. [+2]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of legislative power to introduce an act shows an effort to use influence for societal betterment. [+2]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss significant public issues, contributing to the civic dialogue on judicial ethics and accountability. [+2]