Matt Taibbi

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -43
4/19/2024, 10:30:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Melle, Certified Genius, Ph.D.
@wtfmelle333
·
213d
@mtaibbi @elonmusk would this be engagement farming? This "answer" to my question isn't reflective of my question at all.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
213d
The NYPD settled for $33 million after strip-searching 100,000 people over misdemeanor offenses. I covered Wall Street crime, thefts in hundreds of millions — not one ever had his balls squeezed in public, which happens in street stops https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/…
Melle, Certified Genius, Ph.D.
@wtfmelle333
·
214d
@mtaibbi Isn't white collar crime less violent though? I would imagine that the police don't need to use as much force when arresting white collar criminals.

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation discussing the disparity in treatment between white-collar criminals and those accused of misdemeanor offenses, particularly in the context of police force and justice system biases. The user is engaging in a debate about the seriousness of crimes and the corresponding law enforcement responses, which is a public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather contributes to a discussion on criminal justice disparities. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding any personal attacks or sensitive personal information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting perceived inconsistencies in law enforcement's treatment of different types of crimes. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user engages in constructive criticism of the perceived discrepancies in law enforcement responses, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing issues of justice and law enforcement, the statement uses influence to potentially better societal understanding and policies. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The user responsibly uses the platform to engage in a public discourse about an important societal issue, upholding the principles of free speech. [+1]