Matt Taibbi

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -43
4/19/2024, 10:55:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Rude J. 🇺🇲
@Jjr655R
·
214d
@Dolgin_Andrew @mtaibbi False. You're doing what you supposedly hate.
Andrew Dolgin
@Dolgin_Andrew
·
214d
@Jjr655R @mtaibbi It’s literally the argument being made that Matt is replying to and the top right wing reply reiterates that yes, statistics are a basis for probably cause and that anybody who disagrees should be treated the same as the criminal element that is being abused by stop and frisk.
Rude J. 🇺🇲
@Jjr655R
·
214d
@Dolgin_Andrew @mtaibbi Bs
Andrew Dolgin
@Dolgin_Andrew
·
214d
@Jjr655R @mtaibbi It’s true. Based on statistics, a group of people is deemed a criminal element and a threat by (mostly) the right wing. They then lose their rights. They are de-facto guilty of something by virtue of being in the criminal element class. Therefor, infinite probable cause.
Rude J. 🇺🇲
@Jjr655R
·
214d
@Dolgin_Andrew @mtaibbi Lazy tweet
Andrew Dolgin
@Dolgin_Andrew
·
214d
@mtaibbi Not only do they not understand, they don’t care. This is your new audience whether you like it or not. I’m not saying it reflects on your own opinions, rather the fact that you don’t seem to understand that such people don’t care about rights of “criminal elements” in society.

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation addressing the issue of how certain groups are perceived and treated based on statistical data, which is a public issue. The conversation critiques the use of statistics in justifying policies like stop and frisk, and the broader implications for civil rights and societal treatment of certain groups. This qualifies as public discourse as it engages with societal issues and policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct a perceived injustice by highlighting the unfair generalization of groups, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of the groups discussed by defending them against broad generalizations, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By addressing unfair assumptions, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the groups being generalized. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the flaws in the argument it responds to, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight and potentially correct a societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]