Nikki Haley

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 219

The statement addresses a public issue concerning national security and privacy, specifically focusing on the influence of the Chinese Communist Party and the use of the social media platform TikTok. The tone is assertive and directive, advocating for a specific action to be taken.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement, while advocating for a protective measure, uses charged language ('infiltration') which could potentially stigmatize or harm individuals associated with China or TikTok, indirectly causing harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others in its intent to protect from perceived external influence, but could indirectly affect the dignity of Chinese individuals or users of TikTok by associating them negatively.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive language and does not provide a balanced view or context. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism; it makes a sweeping demand without engaging in a nuanced discussion or considering opposing viewpoints. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence for societal betterment by protecting national interests, but the approach may not be inclusive or considerate of all community members. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to raise a significant issue but could be seen as lacking integrity by not providing a balanced or fully informed viewpoint.