Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of the Pareto Principle in AI development and critiquing the performance of image generators. It references a broader conversation about the timeline for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), involving notable figures in the AI field.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with its words or actions, focusing instead on technical and developmental aspects of AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the subject matter without engaging in personal attacks or disrespectful comments. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting areas in AI that require further effort and improvement, thus fostering a more informed discussion about AI development challenges. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies and the views of public figures about AGI timelines, contributing to a dialogue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the challenges and necessary focus areas in AI development, the statement uses its influence to encourage a more nuanced and realistic approach to AI progress, potentially benefiting societal understanding of AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.