Elizabeth Goitein
@LizaGoitein
·
445d
The statement is a critique of Congress's decision to reauthorize and expand FISA Section 702, expressing disapproval of the legislative action and its implications for civil liberties. The tone is accusatory and critical, and the content directly addresses a public policy issue, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement uses harsh language ('Shame on Congress') which could be seen as somewhat harmful, though it is primarily targeting a group (Congress) rather than individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticism and blame. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement engages in criticism, it does not provide constructive dialogue or suggest alternatives, and it borders on personal attacks against the collective entity of Congress. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight issues of civil liberties and government accountability, aligning with the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.