Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 96
4/20/2024, 7:32:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
429d
@filippie509 ah i think i was subconsciously influenced by that!
Filip Piekniewski🌻 🐘:@filippie509@techhub.social
@filippie509
·
429d
@GaryMarcus Same thought yesterday:
Filip Piekniewski🌻 🐘:@filippie509@techhub.social
@filippie509
·
430d
Another day another LLM trained with hundreds of millions of dollars on the same data as everyone else. Same capabilities.

The half-life of excitement now is about 5 hours. Soon nobody will care.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
429d
What a strange world…

All the major AI companies spending billions producing almost exactly the same results using almost exactly the same data using almost exactly the same technology, all flawed in almost exactly the same ways.

Historians gonna be scratching their heads.

The statement involves a discussion on the implications of current trends in AI technology development, specifically addressing the redundancy and potential lack of innovation in the field. This discussion is framed within the context of a broader societal and historical perspective, questioning what future historians might think of these developments. The statement clearly constitutes public discourse as it engages with substantive issues concerning technology's impact on society and the economy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, focusing instead on a critical analysis of industry trends. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding any personal attacks or sensitive information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    While the statement primarily offers critique, it indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting significant issues in the AI industry, potentially fostering a broader discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI industry without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the actions and strategies of companies. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to prompt reflection and potentially guide better practices in AI development, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly, contributing to the public discourse on important technological and economic issues with integrity. [+1]