Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 54

The statement by @erikengheim engages in public discourse as it addresses the topic of artificial intelligence, specifically large language models and diffusion models, and their limitations in becoming general AI. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue that contributes to the civic dialogue on technology and AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it provides a factual critique of current AI technologies without causing harm or offense. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing solely on AI technology without targeting any individuals or groups. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the capabilities and limitations of current AI technologies, contributing to a more informed public. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies without personal attacks, focusing on the technology itself. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of the speaker to inform and educate about AI technologies, contributing positively to societal understanding of these technologies. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss important aspects of AI technology with integrity. [+1]