In reply to:
Alexander Naumenko
@AlexanderNaume2
·
426d
The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter discussing the nature and definition of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically addressing the misconception or simplification of AI as merely statistics. This conversation involves a critique of how AI is commonly portrayed or understood in media and academic discussions. The statement contributes to a broader discourse on the accuracy and integrity of information related to AI technologies, which is a relevant public issue given the impact and misunderstanding of AI in society.
- The statement does no harm as it contributes constructively to the discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a common misconception about AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the subject matter. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to correct misconceptions, contributing to better societal understanding of AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds principles of free speech responsibly, contributing to an informed discussion on AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.