Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 48

The statement in question is part of a Twitter conversation about the nature and description of deep-learning neural networks in relation to brain function. The specific tweet by @strangetruther, which includes a count of '66' followed by a laughing emoji and a link to a Wikipedia page about David H. Hubel, appears to be a lighthearted contribution to an ongoing discussion about the scientific basis of neural networks. The conversation overall addresses a public issue— the accuracy of scientific analogies used in popular descriptions of artificial intelligence technologies. However, the specific tweet by @strangetruther does not substantively engage with the public issue but seems to add a humorous or trivial element to the discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The tweet does no harm but also does not contribute constructively.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    Respects privacy and dignity, no harassment or hate speech involved. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    Does not significantly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it's more of a humorous aside.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes as it does not raise substantive points.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The tweet does not use influence for societal betterment in a meaningful way.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    Uses the platform without irresponsibility but does not contribute significantly to public discourse.