The statement 'Exactly what I argued 26 years ago and basically still true.' is a response to a discussion on the limitations and capabilities of AI based on deep learning. The statement reflects an agreement with the view that deep learning primarily rehashes past data without significant innovation or understanding beyond its training set. This discussion touches upon the broader implications and understanding of AI technology, which is a topic of public interest and debate.
- The statement does not cause harm but lacks a constructive approach to the discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no evidence of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It merely asserts a position without elaboration.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue but does not provide constructive criticism or a basis for meaningful disagreement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not clearly demonstrate using influence for the betterment of society. It is more of a personal affirmation than a societal contribution.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could use the platform more responsibly to foster a more informed or nuanced discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.