Gary Marcus

The statement '@mattturck @ylecun It’s exactly what our 2017 debate was about. guess i just won though, eh?' appears to be a light-hearted comment in a professional or technical discussion about AI and coding practices. It references a past debate, presumably about AI strategies or methodologies, and playfully suggests that the speaker's position in that debate has been vindicated by recent developments.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm as it is a playful comment in a technical discussion. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement uses a light-hearted tone which may foster a friendly environment, though it does not significantly promote understanding or empathy.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of dialogue, though it is more teasing than constructive.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of any mistakes being made or acknowledged in this statement.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not significantly use influence for societal betterment, as it is focused on a specific technical debate.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech in a responsible manner within the context of a professional discussion. [+1]