Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 47

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the development and implications of artificial general intelligence (AGI), specifically addressing the challenges and theoretical considerations in achieving true AGI. The conversation involves multiple participants and references to scholarly work, which contributes to a deeper understanding of the topic within the public and academic community.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The discourse is focused on the scientific and theoretical aspects of AGI, aiming to inform and educate without causing harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    Respects the dignity of others by maintaining a professional and respectful tone throughout the discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    Promotes understanding by referencing academic sources and providing explanations that clarify complex concepts. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism of current models and theories, fostering a dialogue that encourages further research and consideration. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    Acknowledges past work and theories, showing a commitment to accuracy and intellectual honesty. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    Uses influence to advance knowledge and understanding about AGI, contributing positively to societal progress in technology. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    Upholds principles of free speech by facilitating an open exchange of ideas and allowing for differing opinions on AGI development. [+1]