Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement from the Columbia student protestors constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with issues of university investment policies, human rights, and social justice. The statement expresses frustration with media misrepresentation and emphasizes a commitment to non-violence and inclusivity in their protest.
- The statement aims to do no harm by clarifying misconceptions and rejecting hate or bigotry. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by advocating for a diverse group and condemning hate. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The protestors use their statement to promote understanding of their cause and the reasons behind their actions. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the university's policies and the media's portrayal of their movement. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The protestors acknowledge the risks and consequences of their actions, showing a willingness to correct misunderstandings about their movement. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for social change and justice, reflecting a commitment to using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The protestors uphold principles of free speech responsibly, focusing on substantive issues rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.