Reposted by Ilhan Omar
Seyward Darby
@seywarddarby
·
472d
The statement addresses the issue of media access and coverage regarding a student protest at Columbia University. It criticizes the university for not allowing proper access to reporters and suggests that the limited information available is leading to distorted public perceptions. The statement also reflects on the broader implications of media coverage in shaping public understanding of events.
- The statement aims to highlight a perceived injustice and does not seem to harm individuals with its words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of those involved by focusing on the systemic issue of media access rather than targeting individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By pointing out the potential for misinformation, the statement promotes a better understanding of the situation, although it could provide more context to foster deeper empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism of Columbia University's handling of media access during the protest. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight an issue of public concern, aiming to better society by advocating for more transparent media coverage. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by criticizing restrictions on media access and encouraging a more open dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.