In reply to:
Anil Seth
@anilkseth
·
412d
The statement is part of a discussion on the terminology used in describing errors made by large language models (LLMs), specifically suggesting a shift from 'hallucination' to 'confabulation'. This conversation involves a substantive engagement with issues related to artificial intelligence and cognitive science, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does no harm as it constructively contributes to a technical discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in any form of harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying terminology, which can lead to better communication and comprehension among professionals and the public. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting an alternative term, without any personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By aiming to improve the accuracy of terminology in AI, the statement uses influence to potentially better the field, which can contribute positively to society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion about AI terminology, upholding the principles of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.