Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement 'Por qué la IA subsimbólica no debe ser la única. (Ni, a mi juicio, la dominante.)' engages in public discourse by discussing the role and dominance of sub-symbolic AI in the field. It raises concerns about the reliance on a single type of AI technology, advocating for diversity in AI approaches. The accompanying image and referenced conversation further contextualize the statement by discussing the limitations and potential of AI in mimicking human cognitive processes and errors.
- The statement aims to provoke thought and discussion about AI development strategies, which is beneficial for public understanding and policy making. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by fostering a technical discussion without targeting any individual or group negatively. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of diverse AI approaches, which can lead to more robust and effective AI systems. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the current AI development trends, suggesting improvements without disparaging existing efforts. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for a balanced approach to AI development, the statement uses its influence to promote better societal outcomes in technology. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss important aspects of AI development, contributing positively to the discourse on technology and ethics. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.