+5
In reply to:
Miles Brundage
@Miles_Brundage
·
411d
The statement is a response to a discussion about AI policy strategies, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue. The conversation addresses the need for broader strategic thinking in AI policy, akin to grand strategies in foreign policy. The reply agrees with the sentiment and adds a perspective on the common pitfall of focusing too much on tactics rather than overarching strategies.
- The statement does no harm and supports constructive discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in any form of harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by agreeing with the need for strategic thinking in AI policy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the issue of strategy in policy discussions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to contribute positively to the discussion on AI policy, aiming for a better approach to achieving policy goals. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.