Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement discusses the expectations placed on AI researchers in the context of the growing influence of generative AI technologies. It highlights the multifaceted roles that researchers are expected to fulfill, which goes beyond their technical expertise. The tone is reflective and somewhat critical, aiming to provoke thought about the realistic capabilities and roles of AI researchers.
- The statement does no harm as it does not target any individual or group negatively but rather discusses the roles of AI researchers in general. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of AI researchers by acknowledging the diverse skills required in their field and the unrealistic expectations placed on them. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the complexity of roles that AI researchers are expected to fill, fostering empathy towards their challenges. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in a form of constructive criticism of the expectations from AI researchers, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the roles and expectations of AI researchers, the statement indirectly encourages the use of influence for societal betterment, emphasizing the importance of realistic and supportive expectations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.