Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation discussing the roles and responsibilities of AI researchers, particularly as they transition into leadership roles in highly valued companies. The user criticizes these leaders for failing to provide moral leadership and adequately compensate artists, questioning their ability to handle greater societal harms.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement points out a perceived failure in leadership, which could be seen as an attempt to prevent harm by holding leaders accountable. However, the tone might be perceived as slightly harsh. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not naming specific individuals directly and focuses on the roles rather than personal attributes. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The criticism is sharp but aims to promote a better understanding of the responsibilities of leadership in high-stakes industries. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The user engages in a form of constructive criticism by highlighting a lack of moral leadership and questioning the capabilities of these leaders, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to critique and potentially motivate better performance and accountability from leaders, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]