Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 21

The statement in question seeks to provide a more precise and fair assessment of Tesla's progress toward achieving autonomy in response to a critical comment about the company's efforts. The statement aims to clarify the complexity and challenge of achieving full autonomy in automotive technology, suggesting a more nuanced understanding than the original comment.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm by correcting an exaggeration and providing a more accurate perspective on Tesla's progress, which contributes to a more informed public discourse. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of those involved by avoiding derogatory language and instead focuses on the substantive issue of technological achievement. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by refining the original comment's language to better reflect the reality of technological development in autonomous driving. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By aiming to correct misinformation, the statement uses its influence to better inform the public about the complexities of autonomous vehicle technology, contributing positively to societal understanding. [+2]