In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
326d
The statement by the professor in response to a discussion about the impact of LLMs (Large Language Models) on society constitutes public discourse. It addresses a significant public concern regarding the integrity of the educational process due to the misuse of AI technologies like LLMs. The statement is critical and contributes to the broader debate on the ethical implications and societal impact of AI technologies.
- The statement aims to highlight a negative consequence of LLMs, which is important for public awareness. However, the claim of 'rampant, uncontrollable cheating' could be seen as somewhat alarmist without providing evidence or solutions, potentially causing harm by spreading fear or distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement raises an important issue, it lacks a tone of empathy or compassion towards those who might be using LLMs for legitimate purposes or those working to mitigate these issues.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by pointing out a significant problem. However, it could be improved by suggesting solutions or engaging more positively with those who have different views on the use of LLMs.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the professor's influence to highlight a critical issue, which could contribute to societal betterment by prompting discussions on the need for regulations or ethical guidelines for LLM use. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.