Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score 2
4/22/2024, 11:13:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Griffith F.K.
@griffithf
·
324d
@GaryMarcus This is a general challenge not unique to AI. The people with the most valuable insights into any given field tend to be people involved with that field in ways that sometimes create conflicts of interest.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
324d
And yet, amazingly, almost nobody does this
Zandroid
@Jabippy
·
324d
@GaryMarcus @mustafasuleyman @Microsoft Probably a good idea to discount claims about Ai from people who are poised to make a whole lot of money creating it. Conflicting interest.

The statement '@griffithf That was 5 years ago; I am not there anymore so it’s not currently relevant.' is a response in a conversation about conflicts of interest in AI development. The statement attempts to dismiss the relevance of past affiliations or actions by emphasizing a temporal and situational change.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but also does not contribute constructively to the discussion on ethical concerns in AI.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy of the individual by not disclosing specific details, but it also avoids addressing the underlying issue of conflict of interest.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks an effort to promote understanding or empathy regarding the concerns raised about conflicts of interest in AI. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting to dismiss the relevance of the past situation. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge any past mistakes or the potential implications of previous roles, missing an opportunity for accountability. [-1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It does not use influence to better society but rather sidesteps an important ethical discussion. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech in a responsible or integrity-filled manner, as it shuts down further discussion rather than opening it up. [-1]