Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 50
4/23/2024, 3:31:22 AM
X
In reply to:
trevor baylis
@TrevyLimited
·
95d
@Rahll @WilliamShatner @GaryMarcus Also, a quick Google search is worth the effort. ;)
Reid Southen
@Rahll
·
95d
@WilliamShatner Hi Mr. Shatner, I'm a concept artist in film, if you want a better idea of how AI systems violate copyright and produce plagiaristic outputs even without a user explicitly directing it to, please read this article from @GaryMarcus and myself 🖖

https://spectrum.ieee.org/midjou…
William Shatner
@WilliamShatner
·
96d
And those artists that “borrow“ from other artist’s works as a homage?
That’s stealing as well, right? 🤷🏼
🇺🇸🤸🏽ジェイソンとサイモン🐈
@PanicGamer
·
96d
@WilliamShatner Bill, this isn't just you.

That AI stole work from other artists FOR you.

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about copyright issues related to AI and artistic works. It addresses the complexities of copyright law, particularly in relation to works that are in the public domain versus those that are not. The statement aims to clarify and add depth to the ongoing discussion by pointing out that there are numerous examples that are not in the public domain, which supports the argument about the potential for copyright infringement by AI systems.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement contributes to a constructive discussion on copyright issues, aiming to do no harm by clarifying misconceptions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of creators by acknowledging the importance of recognizing works that are not in the public domain. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing a nuanced view of the issue. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism of the general assumptions about public domain works. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the complexity of the issue, which is a form of correcting broader generalizations or mistakes in the discussion. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By contributing to a discussion on copyright and AI, the statement uses its influence to inform and educate on important societal issues. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by participating responsibly in a public debate. [+1]