Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 102
4/23/2024, 4:22:56 PM
X
In reply to:
Elena Song 🤯
@elenasongsong
·
262d
@GaryMarcus With that logic they should check the history of founder for everything they pay for 😂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
262d
@elenasongsong Actually a long history of that sort of thing. Lots of people refused to go to a Trump hotels, for example. The brand name became a liability.
Elena Song 🤯
@elenasongsong
·
262d
@GaryMarcus It’s the first time I hear people buy things based on the creator’s political views instead of the product itself 😂. Life is not easy for them. It sounds like a very tough decision when she says she can’t do it because of Elon😂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
263d
Who could have seen this coming?
@spotted_model
@spotted_model
·
263d
I’m a huge Tesla supporter obviously. But this hits hard. I have 2 neighbors who were both interested in Teslas who have backed away this year. Both said they can’t stomach Elon’s politics. And I was working with my boss and his wife on their first Model Y. Boss just told me his…

The statement by @elenasongsong addresses the use of boycotts as a tool for individuals who lack direct power or wealth to influence corporate behavior or public policy. This statement is part of a broader conversation about consumer choices influenced by the political actions or statements of company leaders, specifically referencing the impact of Elon Musk's political views on potential Tesla consumers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it simply discusses the legitimacy and rationale behind consumer boycotts as a form of protest or expression. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by not attacking any individuals directly, but rather discussing the actions people can take in response to corporate leadership. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The comment promotes understanding by explaining why people might choose to boycott, helping others see it as a rational choice rather than an overreaction. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by contributing to a discussion on the effectiveness and moral grounds of boycotts. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of any factual inaccuracy or misleading information that would require correction. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of the platform here is responsible, aiming to enlighten others about the power dynamics between consumers and corporations. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing a viewpoint on consumer rights and corporate accountability without infringing on others' rights. [+1]