Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a discussion about the perceived inadequacies of certain individuals in academic settings and extends this critique to Language Learning Models (LLMs), suggesting they exhibit similar shortcomings. The tone is somewhat dismissive and critical, focusing on the behavior of 'pseudo-intellectuals' and the performance of LLMs.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially harm the reputation of individuals who fit the described profile and LLMs by labeling them as ineffective or pretentious. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not show respect for the dignity of those being criticized, grouping all individuals and LLMs into a negative stereotype without acknowledging individual differences or contributions. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a compassionate or empathetic view towards those it criticizes, instead using a tone that might alienate or demean. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   While the statement engages in a form of criticism, it does not foster constructive dialogue or understanding, instead opting for a more divisive approach. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge the complexity of the issues at hand, such as the varying capabilities of LLMs or the diverse reasons why individuals might struggle in academic discussions. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The use of the platform to generalize negatively about a group could be seen as irresponsible, as it spreads a potentially unfounded critique without sufficient evidence or balanced perspective. [-1]