In reply to:
Melissa Hogenboom BBC
@melissasuzanneh
·
266d
The statement is a response to a question about a psychological phenomenon, specifically addressing why words lose meaning when looked at repeatedly. The reply includes a humorous initial comment followed by a link to a Wikipedia page about 'Semantic Satiation,' which directly addresses the question asked. This response is informative and contributes to a better understanding of a specific psychological concept, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does no harm and is focused on providing information in a light-hearted manner. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By providing a credible source, the statement promotes understanding of the psychological concept discussed. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively by directly addressing the question asked without any personal attacks or irrelevant commentary. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.