Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -82
4/24/2024, 11:03:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg C.
@Greg_of_Dundalk
Ā·
615d
@DrJillStein They could back up their so called bravery by going over there and doing the fighting they want someone else to do.
Dr. Jill SteinšŸŒ»
@DrJillStein
Ā·
615d
The bravery of these student protestors is absolutely awe-inspiring. šŸ¤©
Read Let This Radicalize You
@JoshuaPHilll
Ā·
615d
UT Austin students chanting ā€œYou donā€™t scare usā€ even as countless militarized Texas Troopers swarm their campus, attack their protest, and bring in horses. This movement will not be stopped.

The statement '@Greg_of_Dundalk Fighting on behalf of whom?' is a response in a chain of tweets discussing the actions and motivations of student protestors. The statement questions the representation and advocacy in the context of a protest, implying skepticism about the authenticity or legitimacy of the claims made by another user regarding the protestors' bravery and intentions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but challenges the representation of advocacy, promoting a critical view of the motivations behind certain actions.Ā [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by not attacking individuals but rather questioning the general representation of a group's actions.Ā [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by encouraging scrutiny of claims made about advocacy and representation.Ā [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in a form of dialogue by questioning the statements of others, though it could be seen as confrontational rather than constructive.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes as the statement is more about questioning than stating facts.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of influence is neutral; it neither clearly betters nor worsens societal conditions but stimulates discussion.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by using the platform to question and engage in public discourse responsibly.Ā [+1]