Ilhan Omar

The statement is a public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion on the issue of university divestment and its implications on international conflicts, specifically addressing the actions of Columbia University in relation to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The statement is assertive and critical, aiming to influence public opinion and university policies.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to do no harm but is aggressive in its accusations, which could potentially incite further conflict or misunderstanding. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects the dignity of the Palestinian victims but could be seen as dismissive towards the perspectives or safety concerns of others within the Columbia community. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of the signatories' perspective on the conflict and the university's role, but its one-sided nature might not foster broad empathy.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in constructive criticism of Columbia University's policies but does so in a manner that might not encourage open dialogue due to its accusatory tone. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement is firm in its convictions and does not show an openness to acknowledging potential errors in its own stance or approach. [-1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses its influence to advocate for a significant policy change, aiming to better align university investments with what the signatories view as ethical standards. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform of an academic boycott to address what the signatories see as a misuse of power by the university, aligning with responsible use of speech to effect change. [+1]