Gary Marcus

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -32
4/25/2024, 3:37:22 PM
X
In reply to:
NB
@Nechku
·
322d
@GaryMarcus Tbf, she is lying.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
322d
Insane that anyone putatively on the left would attack someone for being in an interracial marriage.

But here we are, as lunatic fringe of the left makes common cause with the lunatic fringe of the right.

Social media and the quest for likes, combined with algorithms that…
Brianna Wu
@BriannaWu
·
322d
If I seem less charitable to Free Palestine today than three months ago, the countless death threats, rape threats, smear campaigns, outright lies, and even attacks by figures like Hasan on my interracial marriage are part of that growing anger.

I think some of you care about…

The statement is part of a conversation thread on social media that discusses the behavior and public statements of individuals, particularly in the context of political and social issues. The content of the statement addresses the reaction to a video by a person named Hasan, which the speaker finds objectionable. This conversation touches upon issues of public discourse, including the integrity and impact of public statements made by individuals on social media.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement indirectly does harm by labeling the video as 'despicable' without providing context or specifics, potentially spreading negativity. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy to an extent but fails in respecting dignity by harshly criticizing without constructive context. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but rather expresses shock and disapproval in a way that could incite further conflict or misunderstanding. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does so in a manner that could be seen as dismissive and non-constructive, lacking in detailed critique or open-minded discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight an issue but does so in a way that may not necessarily lead to betterment of society, given its divisive tone.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to express an opinion on a public issue, but it could be argued that it lacks responsibility and integrity by not fostering a constructive or respectful discourse. [-1]