Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 127

The statement discusses the use of gag orders in the legal system, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to the integrity of court proceedings and juror safety. The mention of a specific individual (Michael Cohen) and the speaker's previous comments about him suggests a personal viewpoint on a public figure, which is relevant to public discourse. The statement also references an appearance on a news show, which indicates an attempt to engage with a broader audience on these topics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to contribute to a discussion on legal practices and their implications, potentially fostering a better understanding of gag orders. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    While the statement respects the dignity of the legal process, the reference to 'blunt comments' about an individual could be seen as less respectful towards that individual.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of why gag orders are used, which could lead to greater public empathy towards the complexities of legal proceedings. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a dialogue about legal issues, which is constructive, though the personal comments about an individual could detract from this.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing legal integrity and safety in public forums, the statement uses influence to highlight important aspects of the justice system. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly by discussing substantive legal issues, though care should be taken to ensure personal comments do not undermine this responsibility. [+1]