The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the topic of age restrictions on medical procedures related to gender identity, comparing them to age restrictions on tattoos. It presents a viewpoint that questions the appropriateness of gender-affirming surgeries for minors, framing it as potentially harmful rather than compassionate.
- The statement may cause harm by characterizing gender-affirming care as 'cruelty' and 'confusion,' potentially contributing to stigma against transgender individuals, especially youth. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not show respect for the dignity of transgender youth, as it dismisses their experiences and the medical consensus on gender-affirming care as valid and necessary for many. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a compassionate approach, as it uses charged language that could alienate or distress transgender individuals and their allies. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards transgender youth. It dismisses the complexities of gender identity and the supportive role that gender-affirming care can play. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to challenge a medical practice but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal understanding or respect for transgender individuals. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.