Gary Marcus

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -41

The statement by Nicholas Kristof addresses the issue of effective communication and advocacy in public settings. It suggests a preference for civil discourse over disruptive actions as a means to influence opinions and foster change. The tone is advisory and promotes a thoughtful approach to activism.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement upholds the principle of doing no harm with words and actions by advocating for non-disruptive, respectful engagement. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    While the statement does not directly address privacy or dignity, the advocacy for non-disruptive behavior indirectly supports the respect for the dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    Kristof's advice promotes understanding and compassion by suggesting that asking questions can be a more effective way to engage and persuade others. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages constructive criticism and dialogue, as asking pointed questions is a method of engaging in meaningful conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By advising on more effective methods of advocacy, Kristof is using his influence to encourage better societal engagement and potentially more productive outcomes in activism. [+2]