Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47

Score 24

@BlueBir75555922 Not so much, because almost the entire field is still obsessed with low-hanging fruit with some other approach that is perhaps starting to running out of steam.

4/25/2024, 9:42:51 PM

In reply to:

Blue 🐋

@BlueBir75555922

342d

@GaryMarcus Gary is there an update from "THE NEXT DECADE IN AI"?

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

342d

So weird the way the market is punishing Zuck for being realistic about the challenges in AI while rewarding Elon and Sam for making lavish promises they are unlikely to be able to keep.

Especially when they are all working on essentially the same kind of tech.

The statement is part of a conversation about the state and future of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically addressing the focus of the field and the approaches being taken. It critiques the current direction of AI research, suggesting that it is overly focused on easily achievable goals ('low-hanging fruit') and may be losing momentum ('running out of steam').

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm with its words, focusing instead on a critique of research directions in AI. It is analytical rather than harmful. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding of the AI field's current state, though it could be seen as somewhat dismissive of current efforts, which might slightly reduce empathy or compassion towards those working in the field.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI field without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than the individuals. [+1]