Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reports on a testimony involving David Pecker and White House officials discussing the extension of Karen McDougal's contract. This touches on issues of governance, ethics, and the use of public office for private dealings, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement itself does not cause harm but reports on potentially unethical behavior, which could indirectly harm public trust in governance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on their professional roles and actions without delving into personal attacks or unnecessary personal details. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement provides information without engaging in dialogue or criticism directly; it does not include personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement raises questions about the use of influence and public office, potentially highlighting misuse which is important for public accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to report on matters of public interest responsibly, contributing to informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.