Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 259
4/26/2024, 3:49:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Craig for Common Sense
@CraigABrill
·
14d
@marwilliamson Sorry every terrorist supporter should be arrested and deported
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
Tell me how this is not the actions of a police state. Go on. I'll wait.
This police behavior has a specific strategy: to scare everyone away from exercising our right to protest. It is disgusting. This woman is not an enemy combatant; she's a citizen exercising her rights…
Robert Mackey
@RobertMackey
·
14d
It is worth watching this CNN video from the moment Emory Econ Professor @CarolineFohlin came across the violent arrest of a protester on campus and asked the police, with shock, "What are you doing?" That's all that prompted an officer to hurl her to the ground and handcuff her.

The statement in question is a response to a claim that anyone supporting terrorists should be arrested and deported. It challenges this assertion by defending the individual's behavior and questioning the logic of deportation for someone born in the country. This engages with issues of civil liberties, citizenship rights, and the appropriate response to alleged support of terrorism, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct potentially harmful rhetoric by defending an individual's rights and behavior, thus doing no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of the individual by defending her against baseless accusations, thus upholding her privacy and dignity. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The response promotes understanding by clarifying misconceptions about the individual's actions and legal status. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the flaws in the original statement's logic without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the need to correct misinformation or harmful assertions in public discourse. [+2]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By defending civil liberties and rational discourse, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, contributing positively to the dialogue on a sensitive issue. [+2]