Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 259
4/26/2024, 4:13:37 AM
X
In reply to:
FrauLevenberg
@FrauLevenberg
·
14d
@WomenForBernie2 @marwilliamson @Columbia That he is fierce and otherwise fantastic of course.
#WomenForBernie
@WomenForBernie2
·
14d
@marwilliamson @Columbia What are you implying?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
Oh my God. @Columbia
Daily Wire
@realDailyWire
·
14d
Meet Khymani James, a student leader of Columbia University’s anti-Israel Gaza Solidarity Encampment who openly states that "Zionists don’t deserve to live"

He made the comments during a meeting with the school that he live-streamed.

We put together the highlights:

The statement in question is part of a Twitter conversation chain reacting to a controversial statement made by a student leader at Columbia University. The user is criticizing another for seemingly endorsing the student leader's extreme views, which reportedly include threatening statements against Zionists. This conversation touches upon issues of free speech, the interpretation of public statements, and the boundaries of acceptable discourse in a university setting.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to challenge harmful rhetoric and protect individuals from threats, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The user respects the dignity of others by condemning threats against life based on ideological differences, supporting the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the potential misinterpretation of another's words as endorsement of harmful views, thus fostering empathy and compassion. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the disagreement directly and focusing on the content of the endorsement rather than attacking the person. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The user acknowledges the seriousness of the accusations and seeks to correct what they perceive as a misrepresentation or endorsement of harmful views. [+2]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By addressing this issue publicly, the user uses their influence to advocate for a more responsible and ethical discourse, particularly in academic and public settings. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a dialogue about the implications of certain statements, using the platform to discuss and critique publicly made statements responsibly. [+2]