Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement discusses a public figure, Governor Kristi Noem, and her actions regarding the treatment of a puppy, as described in her upcoming book. The content touches on ethical considerations and the personal conduct of a public official, which can influence public perception and discussion about animal welfare and the responsibilities of public figures. The statement includes a quote from a professional to provide context or an alternative perspective on the actions described.
- The statement reports on an action that could be seen as harmful, but it does so by providing a professional opinion, which aims to clarify rather than harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on the actions and their public implications rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By including the perspective of a professional dog trainer, the statement promotes understanding of the situation, potentially fostering empathy towards the animal. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism by highlighting a controversial action of a public figure, but it remains focused on the issue rather than devolving into personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight an issue of public concern, potentially prompting discussions on animal welfare and the conduct of public officials. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.