Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47

Score 51

Reposted by Gary Marcus

Why does the new Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Board have so many members with clear vested interests in rapid, unregulated AI adoption, and so few who have AI expertise without those vested interests?

Andrew Curran

@AndrewCurran_

431d

This morning the Department of Homeland Security announced the establishment of the Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Board. The 22 inaugural members include Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Jensen Huang, Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai and many others.

4/26/2024, 6:25:11 PM

The statement questions the composition of the newly established Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Board, expressing concern about the potential conflicts of interest among its members and the adequacy of their expertise in AI without vested interests. This critique is aimed at ensuring the board's effectiveness and impartiality in regulating AI developments.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for a balanced and expert-driven approach to AI safety and security, which is crucial for public trust and effective governance. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects the dignity of others by not attacking individuals but rather questioning the structure and composition of the board, which is a matter of public interest. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of having board members without conflicts of interest, which is essential for unbiased decision-making in AI governance. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
It engages in constructive criticism by pointing out what it perceives as a flaw in the board's composition, thus contributing to the dialogue on how best to regulate AI. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its influence to advocate for a more responsible and ethical approach to AI governance, aligning with societal betterment. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
It upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by using the platform to discuss and critique public policy decisions regarding AI, which is a significant societal issue. [+1]