In reply to:
Nancy Ruler
@RulerNancy
·
449d
The statement '@RulerNancy @Columbia 💚' is a response in a thread initiated by a post concerning a political confrontation at Columbia University. The original post by @DrJillStein involves a contentious political issue, specifically addressing a confrontation with a Zionist at Columbia University, which is a significant and sensitive topic. The response '@RulerNancy @Columbia 💚' uses a heart emoji, typically symbolizing support or positivity. However, the statement itself lacks substantive content or engagement with the public issue presented in the original post. It appears to be more of an expression of general support or sentiment rather than a detailed engagement with the topic.
- The statement does no harm as it does not contain any harmful content or language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not involve any personal attacks or disrespectful language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it lacks substantive content related to the issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue as it does not address the issue substantively.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes as the statement does not engage with the content of the original post.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use its influence for the betterment of society in a substantive way due to its lack of engagement with the issue.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech in a meaningful way as it does not contribute substantively to the discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.