Jill Stien

The statement 'Confronting a Zionist @Columbia U' by @DrJillStein, accompanied by an image of Jill Stein speaking about a 'horrible violation of international law', constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant political and social issue, specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its international legal implications. The subsequent replies by @OfflsenDenise and others using heart emojis do not substantively add to the discourse but indicate support or acknowledgment of the initial statement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight perceived legal and ethical issues, potentially contributing to awareness and discussion. However, the confrontational language ('confronts Zionist') might escalate tensions rather than foster constructive dialogue.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of individuals by not targeting any individual with derogatory language, but the term 'Zionist' can be contentious and may be perceived as disrespectful by some, depending on the context. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on confrontation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does engage in a form of dialogue by bringing attention to a controversial issue, but the approach may not encourage constructive criticism or dialogue due to its confrontational nature. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes, as the statement is assertive and does not suggest openness to other perspectives.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of a public platform to discuss international law and ethical considerations can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, though the effectiveness is limited by the confrontational approach. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech by using the platform to express views on international issues, though responsibility and integrity could be better supported through more balanced and less confrontational discourse. [+1]