Jill Stien

The statement '@nihatulusoy @Columbia 💚' is a response to a conversation thread involving public figures and issues of international concern. The statement itself, however, lacks substantive content related to the issues being discussed. It appears to be an expression of support or solidarity but does not engage with the public discourse in a meaningful way.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm as it is non-confrontational and supportive in nature. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects the dignity of others by not engaging in any negative speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not contribute to understanding, empathy, or compassion as it lacks substantive content.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   There is no engagement in constructive criticism or dialogue.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no mistake to acknowledge or correct in this context.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of influence is neutral, as the statement does not contribute significantly to the discourse.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not utilize the platform irresponsibly, but it also does not use it to promote substantial dialogue.